download dxo pureraw 3 vs topaz photo ai

The Pure RAW exported the pictures into the LR Catalog after processing. That means that after selecting the best photos I let the PureRAW run the batch (of 100 photos or more) in Mac Mini during the night or during the day time when I can work in Mac Air on the other catalog. The PureRAW is a batch processing program. I expect that LR on Microsoft PC will open my Catalogs as well becasue of NTFS format of the disk and I can take my work 'with me' so to say. It gives me a possibility to work parallel on two catalogs at least becasue I have a Mac Air and Mac Mini. For example, after a big shooting somewhere in national park or in Africa I keep the Africa-trip in a separate catalog with the photos on external hard disk formated as NTFS.

I have my LR Catalogs on external drives along with photos classified on years or themes. I have PureRAW fully integrated in my Workflow just in the beginning of processing after the culling of bad pictures. But you can denoise your photos faster in PureRAW becasue it has a batch processing. My partner works with DXO PL and made the tests of de-noising the same photos on both applications. I think, PureRAW and DXO PL have the same engine for de-noising and corrections. I don’t think NIK is properly integrated with Photolab before we get rid of these terrible TIFF-files it demands and creates., I use PureRAW a long time already. That is a terrible legacy of all software designed to be used as plug ins to Adobe-software and that is my main complaint about DXO NIK Collection too. Topaz isn’t the only software to work with intermediate TIFF-files. I have tried Topaz a year ago for some weeks on some Jpeg-files, just as an experiment and that Jpegs is something it does better than Photolab that is designed to exclusively demand RAW for the Deep Prime. I guess people interrested in space phenomenons might find the Topaz image more intresting with it’s details and noise but I would not put it on my wall. The name PureRaw is quite funny when the internediate format is pure TIFF. With Joannas exampel we have no idea what she has done with either of these softwares because neither of them is a “black box” like PureRaw. Which one to chose will be decided by the usage and If a I personally prefer the look of of the PL image before the Topaz image in Joannas comparison I think your point is important to stress.

Download dxo pureraw 3 vs topaz photo ai